Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

Only White Women’s Wisdom?

Friday, July 6th, 2007

A few weeks ago, I was in a new thrift shop in my neighborhood.  I found their book section, which I was surprised to find was stocked with some really fantastic authors and titles.  I was thrilled, because I seemed to have serendipitously stumbled upon the source of my summer reading—I was just finishing up my second year in graduate school and was more than eager to begin thinking about three upcoming months of pleasure reading.  As I surveyed the titles and noticed what I was most interested in, I had a series of thoughts that affected how I chose which ones to put in my basket.

I remembered an idea that my friend, Teresa, had told me about.  She had just finished reading Cunt by Inga Muscio, and she wrote to me, "[Muscio] suggests that everyone go through a year of only consuming art made by women.  Only reading women's writing (magazines and news and books and poetry), only listening to music by women.  If we did it, we could make a significant dent in the male-dominated economy.  We'd also learn how difficult it is, and how rewarding, to seek out women's voices."  I knew that I couldn't do this for an entire year, with required reading for graduate school coming up again in three months, but the idea of having an intentional focus to my summer reading, watching and listening intrigued me.  In the middle of my thrift store search, then, I looked for books by women writers, and was happy to immediately find a book by Margaret Atwood.  I also picked up two by Barbara Kingsolver that I'd read ten years ago, and was eager to meet those characters again.

Then, I realized something else: I was only finding books by white women.  I'm a white woman myself, and had recently come to learn that the majority of the media I take in–from news, movies, television and books–comes from the perspective of white folks.  Even (or, especially) the media and art that I, a self-proclaimed progressive white feminist, usually pay attention to is made by white journalists, directors, painters, writers, musicians, and the like.  So, I immediately revised my challenge: to seek out the voices of women of color, and to learn, as Inga Muscio says, how difficult and rewarding this would be to.

I've realized that I can easily find music, books, magazines, and movies that reflect many of my experiences as a white person, but in mainstream media, women of color would be hard pressed to find those that reflect their own experiences.  Think about it the next time you go to the movies: who are the people portrayed in the movie?  Who is first, second, third billed (often it's white men)?  In your favorite music, who is singing their stories to you?  I don't want to tell you not to listen to your favorite music or not watch the movies you want to see.  Sometimes it's hard enough to find movies directed by white women, for example.  But maybe we can pay attention to what media we're taking in and think about other perspectives we might be missing.

I decided to to this because white folks' art and media have usually come to be understood as the "standard" for what's acceptable and/or profitable in those areas, and I simply want to widen my understanding of what is possible in these areas.  Yet I don't want to be considered a "good" white person for doing this.  Instead, I understand my task as an issue of the reality of my U.S.-American life: I, like many of us, live in communities made up of lots of different kinds of people, and I decided that want to get to know some of the perspectives that I don't readily or easily come in contact with, especially the voices of other women. 

Needless to say, I put down the Kingsolver and Atwood.  I actually walked out of the thrift store empty handed, despite the vast selection of books.  None of the books there seemed to be by women who I could identify as Native American/Indigenous American, Asian American, Latina, African American, or any of the many multitudes of cultures besides European-North American.  

I've had a good time so far in my task.  I've read Sister of My Heart, by Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni, and am in the middle of The Autobiography of My Mother, by Jamaica Kincaid.  I've watched the film Monsoon Wedding , directed by Mira Nair , and have listened over and over to Bahamadia 's album, Kollage.  I was also really excited to get my latest issue of Bitch Magazine in the mail (which, if perhaps managed mostly by women who would identify as European American, strives to include material by and for women whose perspective gets lost in mainstream media).  

If you have any suggestions of music, books, movies, photographs, magazines, for me and other readers, we'd love to hear them!  Please leave them as a comment, below.

I'll write again with updates.  Stay tuned!
Elizabeth

add to sk*rt

How Important is it to Have a Menstruator in the White House?

Tuesday, June 12th, 2007

    I am usually not very political, but I must say that the prospect of having a female President of the United States has got my ears pricked. The only reason why a woman should not be President that I can ever remember anyone giving is that she would be too emotional and unable to make decisions, especially during “that time of the month”—that is to say because she is a menstruator. I have heard this reason more than once, most often in semi-jest, and honestly I haven’t heard it in a while, but I remember these kinds of comments as a young girl. What other reason could men give? Menstruating is what makes us different. Then there is the whole school of thought that women are NOT different. We can do anything men can do. I think there are a masculine and a feminine principle at play here. Generally, women tend to carry more of the feminine principle than men, and men more of the masculine than women, but we all know lots of exceptions to that rule. To tell you the truth, I am more disturbed by women who have made their way into government and business only to act just like men. Clearly, women should not be discounted because of gender and in most ways are not actually different than men. And yet, I think embracing the contrasting way the feminine principle governs a nation and in this case would influence the world is vitally important.
    In my neck of the woods in progressive Vermont, so far the buzz is all about Barack Obama. I’m mildly surprised that everyone is not jumping at the chance just to get a woman (does she even still menstruate?) in the White House. Maybe you all can fill me in on how she’s managed to turn people off. I’m rooting for a female President because I think what the world really needs is the female principle and woman are more likely to carry it than men (especially in politics). But if Hillary Rodham Clinton takes the election and perpetuates the masculine model and Barack Obama becomes President and embraces the feminine, I have to wonder—how important is it to have a full-blooded (pun intended) menstruator in the White House? And I’m sorry, I can’t help it, a menstruator in the “White” House, maybe they are afraid they’ll never get the stains out!

Michelle

add to sk*rt

FTC Merger Block of Whole Foods and Wild Oats - Bam!

Thursday, June 7th, 2007

Whole Foods Market, national purveyors of organic and natural grocery goods, is in the process of acquiring Wild Oats, another national and natural grocer.  The over half a billion dollar deal was moving along as planned until the Federal Trade Commission threw a wrench in the works.  Citing antitrust law infringement, the FTC has filed a complaint against the proposed merger on the grounds that such a union would eliminate substantial competition in the premium natural and organic marketplace.

I never thought that I would so emphatically object to the FTC taking issue with the further consolidation of big business; large corporations often have the majority market share over the smaller players and I like to see these businesses have a chance too - this is America after all.  However, this complaint is incredibly unjust.  The FTC is limiting the natural and organic marketplace by failing to acknowledge the substantial competition that Whole Foods and Wild Oats face from the mainstream grocery market, which continues to add organic lines to their offerings.  The complaint not only ignores and skews this real competition, but it also comes before many more pressing antitrust infringement priorities that exist in this country.  Have they ever heard of Wal-Mart?  Economists and business analysts are left dumbfounded: why is the FTC wasting its time with this?

I am not prone to conspiracy theorizing.  With the attention that this government agency is giving to hindering these thriving businesses and the people's tax dollars that it is taking to do so, I am outraged with the obvious bias that is underway here.  There are associations for every industry in the country and I am sure that there is one for the mainstream grocers out there that has a fulltime staff of lobbyists  political pushers working to ensure that this progressive and successful competitor, Whole Foods, is thrown every barrier possible to entry in the larger grocer marketplace.

My ire stems less from my love of big business (I work at GladRags after all) and more from a desire to see people play fair.  The FTC has set the rules and they should follow them.  They are being preferential and discriminatory and their boldness is shameless.

For some wonderfully elucidating articles, check out the links below.

- Diana

http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2007/06/06/is-whole-foods-building-an-evil-empire.aspx
http://retail.seekingalpha.com/article/37547?source=feed
http://www.smartmoney.com/bn/ON/index.cfm?story=ON-20070605-000643-1522
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2007/06/wholefoods.shtm

add to sk*rt

Deep Economy

Wednesday, May 23rd, 2007

I recently read Bill McKibben’s book, Deep Economy . It is a complicated call to reexamine the “growth” model by which we measure economic health. He suggests a move away from the dominating global economy to one where communities generate more on a local level to meet their needs, and that this kind of economic model is more satisfying and leads to a deeper, more equitable prosperity.

He posits that the concepts “more” and “better” used to be nearly the same thing. If you had more rooms in your house it was better, if you have more products to choose from it’s better. But in our current world, “more” is often resource depleting and polluting and therefore not “better”. I think GladRags fit firmly in the “better” category because they save money for women, and save resources.  So in some ways our products embody the idea of deep economy.

But here’s the irony that we struggle with at GladRags . When your business and your mission is to a make sustainable product that lasts for years, it turns out that your greatest benefit is also your greatest obstacle. We note in our sales literature that our pads last for five years but we know for a fact many women use them for 10.  So as you can imagine we don’t really have many repeat sales. We have satisfied customers but they are not repeat customers.

 The first lesson In Marketing 101 is “make repeat sales to your current customers, because it’s expensive to get new customers”.  Hmmm, that sounds good in theory but once our customer has her GladRags or cup she doesn’t need to buy again.  So our solution has to be always finding the new customer.  And while this might seem like the same old “growth” model of economics, we know that if more women are using our products it really means less pollution and a healthier environment. It seems to refute McKibben’s theory because here “more” is “better”, but only because in this case “more” is “less”.  Wow, too many quotes - I’m dizzy!

Anyway, the gist of this is more women need to know about GladRags. And we’re working on a plan where, you, our satisfied-but-not-repeating-customers, help us get new customers. We welcome your thoughts and ideas as we address our challenge. -Brenda

add to sk*rt
  •  

    September 2008
    M T W T F S S
    « Aug    
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    2930  
  • Recent Posts

  • Categories

  • Archives